From 07da33a191852ff2fc07e13670a7ec2792d566db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dlawler489 <104159223@student.swin.edu.au> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:09:27 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Actually put the failure list in the page The block was built into a `failed` variable and then never interpolated, so runHtml computed it and threw it away. Two deploys changed nothing visible because of this: the API carried the failures and the panel fetched them, but the template never referenced them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 --- public/app.js | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/public/app.js b/public/app.js index 119d4a6..398bc12 100644 --- a/public/app.js +++ b/public/app.js @@ -1460,6 +1460,7 @@ function runHtml(run, detail) { ${run.error ? `
${escapeHtml(run.error)}
` : ''} ${run.note ? `
${escapeHtml(run.note)}
` : ''} ${feed} + ${failed} `; }